Crime 101 Movie Review: A Gritty Crime Thriller That Refuses to Be Just Another Heat Clone
There has been a lot of noise around Crime 101. Some people are calling it one of the best thrillers of the year. Others are dismissing it as a knockoff of the 1995 Al Pacino and Robert De Niro classic Heat. Somewhere in between all of that, the actual movie gets lost.
So let’s reset. This is a standalone Crime 101 review on The Watchlist Diaries. No hype. No agenda. Just the movie.
Crime 101 at a Glance
Category | Details |
Movie Title | Crime 101 |
Genre | Crime Thriller |
Setting | Los Angeles |
Lead Cast | Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Halle Berry, Barry Keoghan, Monica Barbaro |
Runtime | Approx. 2 hours |
Vibe | Slick, tense, character-driven cat-and-mouse |
Watch Level | Theatrical if you love crime thrillers, otherwise OTT-ready |
Verdict | 3.5/5 stars |
What Is Crime 101 About? (Heavy Spoilers Ahead)
First things first. Crime 101 is far better than its marketing suggests. The trailer made it look like a standard high-intensity robbery film. It isn’t. There’s more character work here than you expect. We meet three core players.
Chris Hemsworth plays Mike, later revealed as James Davis. He’s a meticulous jewel thief operating along the 101 Freeway in LA. His rule is simple: quick grabs, perfect plans, zero casualties. He grew up in the foster care system, lives alone, and justifies everything by reminding himself the jewels are insured. He has a number in his head. Once he hits it, he’s done.
Mark Ruffalo plays Detective Lou Lubesnick, an aging cop past his glory days. He’s chasing this elusive, intelligent thief while going through a divorce. He’s good at patterns. Good at reading crime scenes. Obsessed with the chase.
Halle Berry plays Sharon, an insurance broker fighting to stay relevant in a male-dominated industry. She is smart, sidelined, and tired of being overlooked.
Things shift when one of Mike’s robberies goes sideways. An antique gun backfires, he escapes with barely a scratch, but the incident rattles him. His fence brings in Ormon, played by Barry Keoghan, a violent young biker with something to prove. Ormon is reckless, impulsive, and brutal. The opposite of Mike in every way. He also carries the weight of his father’s reputation, a dangerous man we hear about but never fully see.
From there, the movie becomes a layered chase. Mike trying to exit. Lou trying to catch him. Ormon trying to destroy him. Sharon trying to survive. The cat-and-mouse tension carries most of the runtime.
Where Crime 101 Falters
The film clearly plays out in three acts.
Act 1 is tight. The tension is real. The setup works beautifully. Act 3 lands strong and cinematic. Act 2 is where things feel uneven. It isn’t boring. It just doesn’t move with the same precision as Mike’s heists.
We meet Monica Barbaro as Maya, Mike’s love interest. She pushes him to be more human. To dance. To open up. To listen to music. The classic emotional anchor for the self-isolated man.
I couldn’t help but think of the voiceover from Barbie and laugh internally. Casting Chris Hemsworth and asking us to believe he struggles romantically does require some suspension of disbelief. Still, the romance is not what weakens the act.
The real issue lies in logic gaps. Mike is hyper meticulous, yet he seems slow to react when Ormon starts tailing him. You would expect him to secure his IT guy. You would expect him to anticipate leaks. You would expect him to monitor Sharon more closely once she starts shifting allegiances.
Then there’s Lou. His motivations feel the least defined. He’s a good cop, yes. He sees patterns. He wants to catch the thief. But the emotional core behind his decisions shifts without enough buildup. Early Lou feels disciplined and rigid. Later Lou pockets diamonds and bends the rules without the story fully earning that transformation. It doesn’t break the film. It just makes you pause.
Is Crime 101 a Heat Rip Off?
This is the question dominating search engines. No, Crime 101 is not a Heat (1995) rip off. Yes, both films are set in Los Angeles. Yes, both follow a professional thief and a determined detective. Yes, there are visual and tonal similarities. The romance subplot echoes familiar territory. A hotel scene involving Ormon pretending to be staff clearly nods toward classic crime cinema techniques.
But similarity is not duplication.
Lou is not Lieutenant Vincent Hanna. Mike is not Neil McCauley. Their motivations, decisions, and endings move differently. The final act especially separates this film from Heat in tone and moral resolution.
The comparison exists because Heat set the blueprint. That doesn’t mean every LA crime thriller is automatically a clone.
Performances That Elevate Crime 101
The cast does heavy lifting here.
- Chris Hemsworth brings surprising restraint. His Mike feels controlled, quiet, and haunted.
- Mark Ruffalo once again proves why he remains one of the most reliable actors working today. He adds layers to Lou even when the script leaves gaps.
- Halle Berry commands every scene she’s in. Sharon never feels ornamental. She feels grounded and sharp.
- Barry Keoghan is chaos. Ormon works because of him. There’s unpredictability in every glance.
- Monica Barbaro is warm and steady as Maya. She has come a long way from her role in UnREAL, and she holds her own here.
And throughout all of this, Los Angeles feels alive. The film loves the city. The visuals make that clear.
Crime 101 Ending Explained
The final confrontation between Mike and Lou avoids cliché territory.
Lou ultimately lets Mike go after Mike saves him from Ormon. There is moral ambiguity. There are diamonds involved. There is a car involved. There are decisions that reflect flawed humans rather than heroic archetypes.
It plays less like a courtroom drama and more like two tired men recognizing each other across the line. Not everyone will love that choice.
Final Verdict: Is Crime 101 Worth Watching? Yes.
Crime 101 is a solid crime thriller.
It is not flawless. It is not groundbreaking. It is not a masterpiece. It is also not lazy or derivative. It is a well-acted, visually strong thriller with an uneven middle and a confident ending. The cast elevates it beyond what the script alone might have achieved.
Would this film work with a weaker cast? That’s a fair question. And honestly, I’m not sure it would.
Rating:
A good thriller. Not elite. Not forgettable. The kind of film that reminds you why the city of lights remains such a magnetic setting for crime stories.
If you love crime thrillers, watch it in theatres if you get the chance. It plays well on the big screen. If theatres aren’t your thing, this will land comfortably on OTT platforms soon enough. It feels like a future Prime Video staple. Click here to know where you can watch it.
If you’ve already seen it, I genuinely want to know. Did the ending work for you? Or did you want Lou to make a different choice? Drop your take in the comments below.
For more honest movie reviews, keep checking back at The Watchlist Diaries.
You may also like
